IGSNRR OpenIR  > 历年回溯文献
Evaluation of two end-member-based models for regional land surface evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data
Tang R. L.; Li, Z. L.
Source PublicationAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
2015
Volume202
Pages69-82
KeywordEvapotranspiration End-member Sebal Surface Temperature-vegetation Index Triangle Large Aperture Scintillometer (Las) Remote-sensing Data Energy Balance Algorithm Vegetation Index Air-temperature Triangle Method Soil-moisture Sebal Model Sensed Data Heat-flux Evaporation
AbstractThe importance of accurate estimations of regional and global evapotranspiration (ET) has been recognized worldwide in the fields of hydrology, water resource management, meteorology, and global climate change. Given the different structures of the end-member-based surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) and surface temperature vegetation index (T-s-VI) triangle models, which nonetheless use essentially the same definitions of dry and wet pixels, questions arise regarding the nature of the differences between the two models' estimated sensible heat fluxes and latent heat fluxes and what controls the heat flux differences. This study aims to investigate how the SEBAL model and the T-s-VI triangle method differ from each other in the regional evaporative fraction (EF) and ET estimates through analytical deduction and model applications. Because both the SEBAL model and the T-s-VI triangle model are of limited use when deep-layer soil moisture is moderately to significantly stressed, MODIS remote sensing data from 23 clear-sky overpass times between January 2010 and late October 2011, covering a wide range of soil moisture content and fractional vegetation cover conditions, are acquired to assess the two models over a non-water stressed study area on the North China plain. The results show that the SEBAL model is able to produce satisfactory sensible heat flux (H) and latent heat flux (LE) estimates compared with ground-based large aperture scintillometer measurements at the Yucheng station, with small biases of 4.1 W/m(2) and 2.3 W/m(2) and root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 46.4 W/m(2) and 48.6 W/m(2), respectively. However, the T-s-VI triangle model produces much worse H and LE estimates, with biases of 98.5 W/m(2) and 92.2 W/m(2) and RMSEs of 119.3 W/m(2) and 115.5 W/m(2), respectively. Variations of pixel-by-pixel surface available energy and momentum roughness length over the study area are responsible for the differences of the H and LE estimates between the two models. The SEBAL model produces larger EF and ET for most pixels than the T-s-VI triangle method when the same group of dry and wet pixels is applied, especially for pixels characterized by medium to high vegetation fractions or surface soil moisture contents. The T-s-VI triangle method is more sensitive to the surface temperatures of the dry and wet pixels than the SEBAL model. The findings from this study benefit the proper selection of end-member-based models for regional ET estimation and aid in quantifying the resultant uncertainties in the model-derived surface energy components. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Indexed BySCI
Language英语
ISSN0168-1923
DOI10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.12.005
Citation statistics
Document TypeSCI/SSCI论文
Identifierhttp://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/38869
Collection历年回溯文献
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Tang R. L.,Li, Z. L.. Evaluation of two end-member-based models for regional land surface evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data. 2015.
Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
Tang-2015-Evaluation(2116KB) 开放获取CC BY-NC-SAView Download
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Tang R. L.]'s Articles
[Li, Z. L.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Tang R. L.]'s Articles
[Li, Z. L.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Tang R. L.]'s Articles
[Li, Z. L.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: Tang-2015-Evaluation of two en.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
This file does not support browsing at this time
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.